In recent years, Emmanuel Macron has emerged as a prominent and often polarizing figure on the global political stage. As President of France, his leadership style, policies, and personal life have become subjects of intense scrutiny and debate. The podcast episode “Candace Owens Becoming Brigitte” takes a closer look at Macron’s journey to power, exploring the stories and relationships that have shaped his political identity. However, in a realm so rich with speculation and opinion, it is crucial to separate fact from fiction. This blog post aims to provide a thorough fact-check of the claims made in Episode 5 of the podcast, offering precise clarifications and insights to ensure a well-rounded understanding of Emmanuel Macron’s narrative. Join us as we sift through the various assertions presented, bringing clarity to the discussions and shedding light on the facts behind the man at the helm of French politics.

And as we will see, most of these claims lack the necessary proof to substantiate them.

Fact Check Analysis

Claim

The union between Jean Michel Trino and Veronique Drew was announced only after the fact in the local newspaper, Laur Picard.

Veracity Rating: 0 out of 4

Facts

To evaluate the claim that the union between Jean Michel Trino and Veronique Drew was announced only after the fact in the local newspaper, Laur Picard, we need to verify several key elements:

1. **Existence of Jean Michel Trino and Veronique Drew**: There is no information in the provided search results about individuals named Jean Michel Trino and Veronique Drew. Typically, verifying the existence of individuals involves checking public records, news archives, or social media profiles.

2. **Announcement in Laur Picard Newspaper**: The search results do not mention a newspaper called "Laur Picard." To verify this claim, one would need access to historical archives of local newspapers that might include such an announcement. However, without specific details about the location or time frame of the announcement, it is challenging to proceed.

3. **Historical Newspaper Archives**: The search results provide a list of online newspaper archives, primarily from Alberta, Canada, which are not relevant to verifying a claim about a French or European context[2]. For European or French newspapers, one would typically look into national or regional archives, such as the Bibliothèque nationale de France or local French newspaper archives.

Given the lack of specific information about Jean Michel Trino, Veronique Drew, and the Laur Picard newspaper in the search results, it is not possible to verify the claim using the provided sources. To proceed with fact-checking, one would need to access specific historical newspaper archives or public records that might confirm the existence of these individuals and the announcement in question.

**Conclusion**: The claim cannot be verified with the available information. Further investigation would require access to specific historical records or archives that are not mentioned in the search results.

Citations

Claim

Brigitte Macron was the witness to the wedding between Jean Michel Trino and Veronique Drew.

Veracity Rating: 0 out of 4

Facts

## Claim Evaluation: Brigitte Macron as a Witness to Jean Michel Trino and Veronique Drew's Wedding

The claim that Brigitte Macron was a witness to the wedding between Jean Michel Trino and Veronique Drew lacks concrete evidence and appears to be unfounded based on available information. Here's a detailed analysis of the claim and the context surrounding it:

### Background on Brigitte Macron and Conspiracy Theories

Brigitte Macron, the wife of French President Emmanuel Macron, has been the subject of several conspiracy theories, including false claims about her identity and background. One of the most prominent theories, which has been thoroughly debunked, suggests that she was born a man and transitioned, with some claiming she was Jean-Michel Trogneux, her brother[2]. These theories have been widely discredited and lack any credible evidence.

### Candace Owens' Series "Becoming Brigitte"

Candace Owens' series "Becoming Brigitte" explores various conspiracy theories surrounding Emmanuel Macron and his family. However, the series does not provide credible evidence to support its claims and often relies on unverified information and speculation[2].

### Verification of Wedding Documentation or Testimonies

To verify the claim about Brigitte Macron being a witness to a specific wedding, one would need access to official wedding documentation or testimonies from the individuals involved. However, there is no publicly available information or credible sources that support this claim.

### Conclusion

Based on the available information and the lack of credible sources supporting the claim, it appears that the assertion about Brigitte Macron being a witness to the wedding between Jean Michel Trino and Veronique Drew is unfounded. Without concrete evidence from reliable sources, such as official wedding records or direct testimonies, this claim remains speculative and lacks validity.

### Recommendations for Further Verification

1. **Official Wedding Records**: Access to official wedding documentation would be necessary to verify the claim. This could involve checking public records or obtaining permission from the individuals involved to access private records.

2. **Direct Testimonies**: Statements from Jean Michel Trino, Veronique Drew, or other witnesses could provide firsthand evidence to support or refute the claim.

3. **Credible News Sources**: Monitoring reputable news outlets for any coverage of the wedding or related events might provide additional context or evidence.

Without such evidence, the claim remains unsubstantiated and should be treated with skepticism.

Citations

Claim

Veronique Drew had two children with Jean Michel Trau, Jean Jack Roc and Valerie.

Veracity Rating: 0 out of 4

Facts

## Evaluation of the Claim: Veronique Drew and Jean Michel Trau's Children

The claim that Veronique Drew had two children, Jean Jack Roc and Valerie, with Jean Michel Trau, is presented without specific evidence or reliable sources to support it. To verify this claim, one would typically rely on official documents such as birth records, marriage certificates, and divorce documents. However, the search results do not provide any direct information about Veronique Drew, Jean Michel Trau, or their alleged children.

### Steps for Verification

1. **Birth Records**: Access to birth records would be essential to confirm the existence and parentage of Jean Jack Roc and Valerie. These records are typically maintained by local or national authorities and may require specific permissions to access.

2. **Marriage and Divorce Documents**: Marriage and divorce certificates can provide evidence of the relationship between Veronique Drew and Jean Michel Trau. These documents often include information about children born during the marriage.

3. **Public Records and Media Reports**: While public records and media reports can sometimes provide insights into personal relationships and family dynamics, they may not always be accurate or up-to-date.

### Conclusion

Without access to specific documents or reliable sources confirming the claim, it cannot be verified. The claim appears in the context of a broader discussion about French President Emmanuel Macron's connections and background, but it lacks concrete evidence to support its validity.

### Recommendations for Further Investigation

– **Access Official Documents**: Obtain birth, marriage, and divorce records from relevant authorities.
– **Consult Reliable Sources**: Look for reputable news outlets or academic publications that may have covered the individuals in question.
– **Use Facial Recognition Technology with Caution**: While facial recognition technology can be used to explore visual similarities, it is not a reliable method for verifying familial relationships without additional context.

In summary, the claim about Veronique Drew and Jean Michel Trau's children remains unsubstantiated due to the lack of direct evidence from trustworthy sources.

Citations

Claim

Emmanuel Macron was admitted to the ENA school without completing the required oral exam.

Veracity Rating: 0 out of 4

Facts

## Claim Evaluation: Emmanuel Macron's Admission to ENA

The claim that Emmanuel Macron was admitted to the École Nationale d'Administration (ENA) without completing the required oral exam lacks concrete evidence from reliable sources. To evaluate this claim, we must consider the typical admission process for ENA and any available information about Macron's admission.

### ENA Admission Process

ENA is known for its rigorous selection process, which includes both written and oral exams. The "grand oral" is a critical component, where candidates are grilled by a panel on a specific topic, testing their knowledge and ability to think critically under pressure[1]. This process is designed to assess a candidate's suitability for high-level civil service positions.

### Macron's Background and Admission

Emmanuel Macron attended Sciences Po before being admitted to ENA. There is no widely reported or documented evidence suggesting that he bypassed the oral exam. Macron himself has spoken positively about his time at ENA, acknowledging its role in his career[1][3]. Given the prestige and competitiveness of ENA, it is unlikely that such a significant deviation from the standard admission process would go unreported.

### Conclusion

Without specific documentation or credible sources indicating that Macron was exempt from the oral exam, this claim remains unsubstantiated. ENA's rigorous selection process and Macron's own reflections on his time there suggest that he likely followed the standard admission procedures.

### Recommendations for Further Verification

1. **ENA Admission Records**: Access to ENA's historical admission records could provide definitive proof of Macron's admission process.
2. **Academic Guidelines**: Reviewing ENA's official guidelines and policies during Macron's admission year could clarify if any exceptions were possible.
3. **Credible News Sources**: Investigating reputable news outlets and academic publications for any mention of irregularities in Macron's admission could offer additional insights.

In summary, without concrete evidence from reliable sources, the claim that Emmanuel Macron was admitted to ENA without completing the required oral exam remains speculative.

Citations

Claim

There was significant backlash against Emmanuel Macron's rankings in the ENA program, which were canceled for the first time in its history.

Veracity Rating: 0 out of 4

Facts

The claim that there was significant backlash against Emmanuel Macron's rankings in the ENA program, which were canceled for the first time in its history, does not appear to be supported by available evidence. Here's a breakdown of the claim and the relevant information:

1. **ENA and Macron's Background**: Emmanuel Macron is a graduate of the École Nationale d'Administration (ENA), a prestigious French institution known for producing many of France's top political leaders. Macron's connection to ENA is well-documented, and he has been a prominent figure in French politics since his graduation in 2004[2][3].

2. **Cancellation of Rankings**: There is no mention in reputable sources of Macron's rankings in the ENA program being canceled for the first time in its history. The ENA has faced criticism for its elitism and the dominance of students from privileged backgrounds, but there is no record of a controversy specifically related to Macron's rankings[1][2].

3. **Backlash and Controversy**: The ENA has been a subject of controversy, particularly regarding its role in perpetuating elitism in French society. Macron himself proposed abolishing the ENA as part of broader reforms aimed at increasing social mobility and addressing criticisms of elitism[1][2]. However, this does not relate to any specific backlash against Macron's rankings.

4. **Validation through Records and News Reports**: To validate the claim, one would need to consult ENA records or news reports from the time Macron attended the institution. However, there is no evidence in available sources to support the claim of a significant backlash against Macron's rankings or their cancellation.

In conclusion, the claim about significant backlash against Emmanuel Macron's rankings in the ENA program, which were allegedly canceled for the first time in its history, lacks supporting evidence from reliable sources. The controversy surrounding ENA is more related to its elitist reputation and Macron's later proposals to reform or abolish it rather than any specific issue with his personal rankings.

Citations

Claim

Xavier Posar's book titled 'Becoming Jit' documents claims about Emmanuel Macron and has recorded interviews from an eight-year investigation.

Veracity Rating: 0 out of 4

Facts

## Evaluation of the Claim

The claim states that Xavier Posar's book, titled "Becoming Jit," documents claims about Emmanuel Macron and includes recorded interviews from an eight-year investigation. However, there are several issues with verifying this claim:

1. **Lack of Information on Xavier Posar and "Becoming Jit"**: There is no readily available information or credible sources confirming the existence of a book titled "Becoming Jit" by Xavier Posar, nor any details about such an investigation or interviews related to Emmanuel Macron.

2. **Confusion with Similar Names**: The search results mention Xavier Poussard discussing Brigitte Macron's past, but there is no mention of Xavier Posar or a book titled "Becoming Jit" related to Emmanuel Macron[1]. This suggests a possible mix-up in names or confusion with different individuals.

3. **Verification Process**: To verify the claim, one would need to locate and review the book "Becoming Jit" by Xavier Posar. However, without concrete evidence or references to such a book, it is challenging to assess the validity of the claim.

4. **Candace Owens' Series**: The mention of Candace Owens' series "Becoming Brigitte" and her exploration of Emmanuel Macron's connections does not directly relate to Xavier Posar or his alleged book. Owens' work focuses on different aspects of Macron's life and public image but does not provide evidence for the claim about Xavier Posar's book.

## Conclusion

Based on the available information, the claim about Xavier Posar's book "Becoming Jit" and its contents regarding Emmanuel Macron cannot be verified. The lack of credible sources or references to such a book makes it difficult to confirm the validity of this claim. Therefore, without further evidence, the claim remains unsubstantiated.

Citations

Claim

In 2008, Emmanuel Macron was supposed to have publicized an order from the minister that granted him leave from compulsory civil service.

Veracity Rating: 0 out of 4

Facts

To evaluate the claim that Emmanuel Macron publicized an order from the minister granting him leave from compulsory civil service in 2008, we need to examine available historical records and official documents. However, the claim seems to be intertwined with broader narratives about Macron's career and connections, particularly his employment at Rothschild & Co. and his background in public service.

## Background on Emmanuel Macron's Career

Emmanuel Macron worked as a senior civil servant at the Inspectorate General of Finances before joining Rothschild & Co. in 2008. He had previously trained for a senior civil service career at the École nationale d'administration (ENA), graduating in 2004[1]. Macron did not perform national service because he was pursuing his graduate studies, and he belonged to the last cohort for whom military service was mandatory[1].

## Civil Service and Leave

There is no specific mention in reliable sources of Macron publicizing an order from a minister granting him leave from compulsory civil service in 2008. However, it is known that Macron paid €50,000 to buy himself out of his government contract in 2008, which allowed him to leave his civil service position and join Rothschild & Co.[1]. This action suggests that he formally exited his civil service role rather than being granted leave.

## Employment at Rothschild & Co.

Macron's employment at Rothschild & Co. from 2008 to 2012 is a well-documented fact[2]. His role there was significant, as he became known for his ability to attract clients. However, this employment does not directly relate to the claim about civil service leave.

## Conclusion

Based on available information, there is no evidence to support the claim that Macron publicized an order from a minister granting him leave from compulsory civil service in 2008. Instead, Macron formally exited his civil service role by buying out his contract, which allowed him to pursue a career in finance at Rothschild & Co.[1]. The narrative surrounding Macron's connections and career is often intertwined with broader discussions about his background and political rise, but specific claims should be verified through reliable sources.

Citations

Claim

Candace Owens alleges that any journalist reporting on the Rothschild family in France faces antisemitism charges.

Veracity Rating: 0 out of 4

Facts

## Evaluation of Candace Owens' Claim

Candace Owens' claim that any journalist reporting on the Rothschild family in France faces antisemitism charges lacks concrete evidence and appears to be an unsubstantiated assertion. To assess the validity of this claim, we need to examine available news reports, legal cases, and academic analyses related to press freedom and antisemitism in France.

### Freedom of the Press and Antisemitism Charges

1. **Legal Framework**: France has strong laws protecting freedom of the press, including the 1881 Freedom of the Press Act, which ensures journalists can report freely unless they commit defamation or incite hatred. However, there is no specific law that automatically equates reporting on the Rothschild family with antisemitism charges.

2. **Antisemitism Laws**: France has laws against hate speech and antisemitism, but these are generally applied to protect individuals from discrimination and hate speech, not to suppress journalistic inquiry into specific families or groups.

3. **Rothschild Family Coverage**: There is no documented case where a journalist in France was charged with antisemitism solely for reporting on the Rothschild family. Journalistic investigations into powerful families, including the Rothschilds, are common and generally protected under press freedom laws.

4. **Candace Owens' Claims**: Candace Owens is known for promoting conspiracy theories and controversial views, including those related to antisemitism and political figures[1][2][3]. Her claims often lack evidence and are not supported by mainstream media or academic sources.

### Conclusion

Based on available information, Candace Owens' claim that journalists reporting on the Rothschild family in France face antisemitism charges is not supported by evidence. Journalistic freedom in France is protected by law, and there is no indication that reporting on specific families automatically leads to such charges. The claim appears to be another example of Owens' unsubstantiated assertions, which often blend conspiracy theories with political commentary.

## References

While the search results do not provide specific cases or laws directly supporting Owens' claim, they highlight her history of promoting unsubstantiated theories and the legal protections for press freedom in France. For a comprehensive evaluation, additional research into French press laws and specific legal cases involving the Rothschild family would be necessary.

—

**Note**: The search results do not provide direct evidence to support or refute Owens' specific claim about journalists facing antisemitism charges for reporting on the Rothschild family. However, they do highlight the broader context of press freedom and the lack of evidence supporting Owens' assertions.

Citations

Claim

Candace Owens claims that the AI technology returned a low probability that Brigitte Macron is the same person depicted in certain childhood and wedding photos.

Veracity Rating: 0 out of 4

Facts

## Evaluating Candace Owens' Claim About Brigitte Macron

Candace Owens has made several claims about Brigitte Macron, including the assertion that AI technology returned a low probability that Brigitte Macron is the same person depicted in certain childhood and wedding photos. To evaluate this claim, we need to consider the available evidence and the context of these assertions.

### Background of the Claims

1. **Conspiracy Theory**: The core of Owens' claims revolves around a debunked conspiracy theory that Brigitte Macron was born a biological man and transitioned to become a woman. This theory has been widely discredited and lacks credible evidence[1][2].

2. **Use of AI Technology**: While Owens discusses using AI technology to question the authenticity of photos, there is no concrete evidence provided to support her specific claim about the AI results. The use of facial recognition technology can be complex and may yield varying results depending on the quality of the images and the algorithms used.

3. **Legal and Public Response**: Brigitte Macron has taken legal action against individuals spreading these false claims. In one case, a French court ordered two individuals to pay damages for defamation related to these conspiracy theories[1].

### Evaluation of the Claim

– **Lack of Evidence**: Owens' claims are not supported by credible evidence. The conspiracy theory about Brigitte Macron's gender identity has been thoroughly debunked by French authorities and legal experts[2].

– **Misuse of Technology**: Without specific details on the AI technology used or the methodology behind the facial recognition analysis, it is difficult to assess the validity of Owens' claims about the AI results. Facial recognition technology can be influenced by numerous factors, including image quality and algorithmic biases.

– **Contextual Misinformation**: Owens' series often intertwines unrelated topics and figures, creating a narrative that is not grounded in factual evidence. This approach can lead to misinformation and confusion among viewers.

### Conclusion

Based on the available information, Candace Owens' claim about AI technology returning a low probability that Brigitte Macron is the same person in certain photos lacks concrete evidence and is part of a broader, debunked conspiracy theory. The use of AI technology in this context appears to be speculative and not supported by credible sources. Therefore, this claim should be treated with skepticism until more reliable evidence is presented.

In summary, while Owens' claims might attract attention due to their sensational nature, they do not align with factual evidence or credible sources. The scientific community emphasizes the importance of evidence-based claims, especially when using technology like facial recognition, which can be subject to various biases and inaccuracies.

Citations

Claim

Jean Michel Trino married Veronique Drew on November 24, 1980.

Veracity Rating: 1 out of 4

Facts

## Evaluating the Claim: Jean Michel Trino Married Veronique Drew on November 24, 1980

To verify the claim that Jean Michel Trino married Veronique Drew on November 24, 1980, we would typically rely on marriage records or local newspapers from that time. However, the search results provided do not contain any specific information about this marriage or the individuals involved.

### Steps for Verification

1. **Marriage Records**: Official marriage records from the relevant jurisdiction would be the most reliable source to confirm the date and existence of the marriage. These records are typically maintained by local or national authorities and may be accessible through public records databases or by contacting the relevant government office.

2. **Local Newspapers**: Local newspapers from the area where the marriage allegedly took place might have published announcements or reports of the event. These could provide additional evidence, though they might not always be comprehensive or easily accessible.

3. **Public Databases and Genealogy Sites**: Websites like Ancestry.com or FamilySearch.org can sometimes provide access to historical marriage records, though availability varies by region and the quality of digitization efforts.

### Conclusion

Without access to specific marriage records or local news archives from November 24, 1980, we cannot confirm the claim about Jean Michel Trino's marriage to Veronique Drew. The claim remains unverified based on the information available.

### Additional Considerations

– **Name Variations**: It's possible that the name "Jean Michel Trino" might be misspelled or vary slightly in different sources. This could affect the search for relevant records.
– **Public Profile**: If Jean Michel Trino or Veronique Drew are public figures, there might be more information available through news articles or biographical sources. However, without specific details, it's challenging to find relevant information.

In summary, while the claim cannot be verified with the current information, it could potentially be confirmed through marriage records or local news archives from the time.

Citations

Claim

Veronique Drew falsely claimed she had only been married once on a tax document dated January 1992.

Veracity Rating: 2 out of 4

Facts

## Claim Evaluation: Veronique Drew Falsely Claimed She Had Only Been Married Once

The claim that Veronique Drew falsely stated she had only been married once on a tax document dated January 1992 is based on information from an episode of "Becoming Brigitte" by Candace Owens. This episode explores controversial connections involving French President Emmanuel Macron and delves into the past relationships of figures like Jean-Michel Tragneau and Veronique Drew[1][3].

### Evidence and Analysis

1. **Source of Information**: The primary source for this claim is the episode of "Becoming Brigitte," which discusses Veronique Drew's marriage history and her alleged omission of a previous marriage to Jean-Michel Tragneau in a tax document[1]. However, this source is not a traditional academic or governmental publication but rather a media program.

2. **Tax Documents and Public Records**: To substantiate this claim, one would need to access the specific tax document from January 1992 and verify its contents against public records of Veronique Drew's marital history. This would involve obtaining official documents or records that confirm her previous marriages.

3. **Legal Implications**: If Veronique Drew did indeed misrepresent her marital history on a tax document, this could have legal implications. Misrepresentation on tax documents can lead to penalties or legal action, depending on the jurisdiction and specific laws regarding tax fraud[2].

4. **Lack of Official Confirmation**: Currently, there is no official confirmation or denial from relevant authorities or Veronique Drew herself regarding this specific claim. The narrative is largely based on investigative journalism and speculation.

### Conclusion

While the claim suggests that Veronique Drew may have misrepresented her marital history on a tax document, it remains unsubstantiated without direct access to the document or official confirmation. The information is derived from a media program and lacks the backing of academic or governmental sources. Therefore, the claim cannot be definitively verified without further evidence.

To confirm this claim, it would be necessary to obtain and review the specific tax document from January 1992, as well as any relevant public records or statements from Veronique Drew or official authorities. Until such evidence is available, the claim remains speculative.

Citations

Claim

Emmanuel Macron was appointed to President Hollande's team as an economic advisor after leaving the Rothschild Bank.

Veracity Rating: 3 out of 4

Facts

## Evaluation of the Claim: Emmanuel Macron's Appointment as Economic Advisor After Leaving Rothschild Bank

The claim that Emmanuel Macron was appointed to President Hollande's team as an economic advisor after leaving the Rothschild Bank can be evaluated by examining Macron's career trajectory and public records.

### Career Background

Emmanuel Macron graduated from the École nationale d'administration (ENA) in 2004 and worked as an Inspector of Finances for four years. In 2008, he joined Rothschild & Cie Banque as an investment banker, where he quickly rose through the ranks, becoming a partner by 2010[1][2]. Macron left Rothschild in 2012.

### Appointment to Hollande's Team

After leaving Rothschild, Macron was appointed as the deputy secretary-general of the Élysée Palace in May 2012, shortly after François Hollande's election as President of France[2][3]. This role positioned him as a senior advisor to Hollande, which aligns with the claim of him serving as an economic advisor.

### Evidence Supporting the Claim

1. **Timing and Position**: Macron's transition from Rothschild to the Élysée Palace in 2012 supports the claim. His role as deputy secretary-general involved advising Hollande on economic matters, effectively making him an economic advisor[2][3].

2. **Public Records**: Macron's appointment to Hollande's administration is well-documented in public records and reputable sources, confirming his role as a key economic advisor[3][5].

3. **Career Progression**: Macron's career progression from Rothschild to a senior role in Hollande's administration highlights his influence in economic policy, further validating the claim[2][3].

### Conclusion

Based on the evidence from reliable sources, the claim that Emmanuel Macron was appointed to President Hollande's team as an economic advisor after leaving the Rothschild Bank is **substantially true**. Macron's role as deputy secretary-general of the Élysée Palace involved advising Hollande on economic matters, aligning with the responsibilities of an economic advisor.

However, it is worth noting that Candace Owens' episode and its focus on controversial connections and familial ties are not directly relevant to the specific claim about Macron's appointment as an economic advisor. The claim itself is supported by Macron's documented career trajectory and public roles.

Citations

Claim

The deputy chairman of the council for State legal ethics remarked that he had never seen someone given an exemption from compulsory civil service.

Veracity Rating: 1 out of 4

Facts

To evaluate the claim that the deputy chairman of the council for State legal ethics remarked he had never seen someone given an exemption from compulsory civil service, we need to verify this statement through official publications or statements from the relevant council. However, the provided search results do not include specific information about this claim or the council's statements on exemptions from compulsory civil service.

### Steps for Verification

1. **Consult Official Publications**: The claim could be verified by consulting official publications or press releases from the council for State legal ethics. These documents might contain statements or records of exemptions granted.

2. **Review Legal Framework**: Understanding the legal framework surrounding compulsory civil service in the relevant jurisdiction could provide context on whether exemptions are typically granted and under what conditions.

3. **Contact the Council Directly**: Directly contacting the council or its representatives could provide firsthand information on their policies and practices regarding exemptions.

### Analysis of the Claim

Without specific evidence or statements from the council, it is challenging to confirm the validity of the claim. The claim suggests a lack of precedent for exemptions, which could be significant if true, as it implies a strict adherence to compulsory civil service requirements.

### Conclusion

Given the absence of direct evidence or relevant information in the search results, the claim cannot be verified at this time. Verification would require access to specific statements or records from the council for State legal ethics.

### Additional Context

The search results primarily focus on legal ethics and practices in France, such as attorney-client privilege and internal investigations, but do not address the specific claim about exemptions from compulsory civil service. Therefore, additional research or direct inquiry with the relevant council is necessary to assess the claim's validity.

Citations

Claim

The Rothschild family has proven ties to Jeffrey Epstein and has been involved in various scandals.

Veracity Rating: 2 out of 4

Facts

## Evaluating the Claim: Rothschild Family Ties to Jeffrey Epstein and Scandals

The claim that the Rothschild family has proven ties to Jeffrey Epstein and has been involved in various scandals can be assessed by examining credible news sources and legal documents. Here's a detailed evaluation based on available information:

### Ties to Jeffrey Epstein

1. **Ariane de Rothschild's Connection**: Ariane de Rothschild, the CEO of the Edmond de Rothschild Group, had extensive financial and professional entanglements with Jeffrey Epstein. They discussed business deals, and Epstein asked her for help in finding a new assistant[1][3]. Initially, the Rothschild firm denied any relationship with Epstein, but later acknowledged these interactions were part of normal business dealings[1][3].

2. **Business and Financial Involvement**: Epstein and Rothschild negotiated a $25 million contract for risk analysis services, and Rothschild purchased auction items on Epstein's behalf[3]. These interactions suggest a professional relationship but do not necessarily imply involvement in Epstein's criminal activities.

### Involvement in Scandals

1. **Epstein's Sex Trafficking Ring**: While the Rothschild family's business dealings with Epstein have been documented, there is no evidence linking them directly to his sex trafficking operations. The focus of the scandals surrounding Epstein involves his abuse of minors and the network of powerful individuals who may have been aware of or involved in his activities[2].

2. **General Scandals**: The Rothschild family has historically faced various conspiracy theories and criticisms related to their wealth and influence. However, these are often unfounded and lack concrete evidence[4]. The family's involvement in financial and business scandals is not uncommon for entities of their size and influence, but specific ties to Epstein's criminal activities remain unsubstantiated.

### Conclusion

In conclusion, while Ariane de Rothschild had professional interactions with Jeffrey Epstein, there is no evidence to suggest that the Rothschild family was involved in his sex trafficking operations or other scandals directly related to Epstein. The claim of proven ties to Epstein's criminal activities appears to be unsubstantiated by credible sources. However, the Rothschild family's business dealings with Epstein have been acknowledged and scrutinized due to the nature of their professional relationship.

**Recommendation for Further Research**:
– Investigate official statements and acknowledgments from the Rothschild family or related entities regarding their interactions with Epstein.
– Review legal documents and court records related to Epstein's case for any mentions of the Rothschild family.
– Consider the broader context of conspiracy theories surrounding the Rothschild family and their historical impact on public perception.

Citations

Claim

Xavier Psar claims that the Rothschilds maintain their fortune through interbreeding and alliances between cousins.

Veracity Rating: 2 out of 4

Facts

To evaluate the claim made by Xavier Psar that the Rothschilds maintain their fortune through interbreeding and alliances between cousins, we need to examine historical practices within the family and assess whether these practices have contributed significantly to their wealth.

## Historical Context of Rothschild Family Practices

The Rothschild family, a prominent banking dynasty, has a long history of strategic marriages within the family. This practice was initiated by Mayer Amschel Rothschild, the founder of the family's banking empire, who encouraged his descendants to marry within the family to preserve wealth and maintain control over their financial institutions[4].

### **Marriage Practices**

Between 1824 and 1877, there were 36 marriages among Mayer Rothschild's male descendants, with 30 of these marriages being between first or second cousins[4]. This practice was common among European aristocratic and wealthy families during that period, as it helped to consolidate wealth and maintain family ties.

### **Impact on Wealth**

While intermarriage helped maintain family cohesion and control over their financial empire, it was not the sole factor in their wealth accumulation. The Rothschilds' success was largely due to their innovative banking practices, strategic business decisions, and their ability to establish a network of financial institutions across Europe[2][4]. Their wealth was also significantly enhanced by their role in financing governments during times of war, such as the Napoleonic Wars[4].

### **Evaluation of the Claim**

The claim that the Rothschilds maintain their fortune primarily through interbreeding and alliances between cousins oversimplifies the complex factors contributing to their wealth. While family marriages did help preserve wealth and control, the Rothschilds' financial success is more accurately attributed to their entrepreneurial skills, strategic business practices, and historical opportunities in international finance[2][4].

In conclusion, while intermarriage was a part of Rothschild family practices, it was one of several factors contributing to their wealth. The claim made by Xavier Psar does not fully capture the broader historical and economic context that has enabled the Rothschilds to maintain their financial influence over centuries.

## References

[1] American Jewish Committee. *Rothschild | #TranslateHate | AJC – American Jewish Committee*
[2] Wikipedia. *Rothschild family*
[3] The Economic Times. *A show seeks to debunk the Rothschild dynasty conspiracy theory*
[4] Investopedia. *Rothschild Family: History, Net Worth, and Facts*
[5] Rothschild Archive. *Exhibitions ‹ Rothschild Timeline*

Citations

Claim

The technology known as Face++ accurately identifies individuals even with modifications to their appearance.

Veracity Rating: 2 out of 4

Facts

## Evaluating the Claim: Face++ Accurately Identifies Individuals with Modifications to Their Appearance

To assess the claim that Face++ accurately identifies individuals even with modifications to their appearance, we need to consider the broader context of facial recognition technology's capabilities and limitations.

### Overview of Facial Recognition Technology

Facial recognition technology uses computer vision to analyze facial features and compare them against a database of images. This technology has seen significant improvements in accuracy over the years, with many leading algorithms achieving accuracy rates over 99% across various demographic groups[1][5]. However, accuracy can vary based on factors such as image quality, capture conditions, and the specific algorithm used[1][4].

### Accuracy with Appearance Modifications

While facial recognition technology has advanced, its performance with modifications to appearance (e.g., makeup, facial hair, or aging) can be challenging. Studies and evaluations by organizations like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have shown that algorithms vary in their ability to handle such changes[5]. High-quality images and well-designed algorithms are crucial for maintaining accuracy in these scenarios.

### Specifics of Face++

Without specific data or studies directly evaluating Face++'s performance with appearance modifications, it's difficult to definitively confirm the claim. However, if Face++ utilizes advanced algorithms similar to those evaluated by NIST, it is likely capable of achieving high accuracy under optimal conditions.

### Conclusion

While facial recognition technology, including potentially Face++, can be highly accurate under ideal conditions, its performance with modifications to appearance may vary. The claim that Face++ accurately identifies individuals with such modifications is plausible but requires specific evidence or studies to fully validate. In general, facial recognition technology continues to improve, but it is not foolproof, especially in scenarios involving significant changes in appearance or less-than-ideal image quality[1][5].

### Recommendations for Further Evaluation

1. **Specific Studies on Face++**: Look for studies or reviews that specifically evaluate Face++'s performance with appearance modifications.
2. **NIST Evaluations**: Consult NIST reports for insights into how facial recognition algorithms perform across different conditions and demographic groups.
3. **Technological Reviews**: Review technology assessments from reputable sources to understand the current state of facial recognition technology in handling appearance changes.

Citations

Claim

Xavier Psar has never been sued by the Macron family for his claims, while other journalists have faced lawsuits for smaller mistakes.

Veracity Rating: 4 out of 4

Facts

The claim that **Xavier Pousard has never been sued by the Macron family for his claims** highlights a contrast in legal outcomes for different journalists. While Pousard has not faced lawsuits, other journalists like **Natasha Ray** have been sued for smaller mistakes, often related to privacy or defamation issues[1].

Here are some key points regarding the legal and media dynamics surrounding the Macron family:

– **Xavier Pousard's Work**: Pousard has been working on stories related to the Macron family for years, including claims about Brigitte Macron's past. Despite his thorough investigations, he has not been sued for defamation, possibly due to the thoroughness of his work[1].

– **Natasha Ray and Other Journalists**: In contrast, other journalists like Natasha Ray have faced legal action. Ray was sued for invasion of privacy and has faced significant backlash, including attempts to ruin her reputation[1].

– **Candace Owens' Involvement**: Candace Owens has also been involved in controversies surrounding the Macron family, particularly regarding claims about Brigitte Macron's gender identity. She received a legal letter from the Macrons but has vowed not to be intimidated, using the situation to press for more information[2].

– **Media and Legal Dynamics**: The legal outcomes for these journalists reflect broader dynamics in media and law, where some individuals may face more severe legal consequences than others for similar or less severe infractions. This can be influenced by factors such as the nature of the claims, the thoroughness of the reporting, and the legal strategies employed by those involved[1][2].

Citations

We believe in transparency and accuracy. That’s why this blog post was verified with CheckForFacts.
Start your fact-checking journey today and make the world a more informed place!